🔗 Share this article

Prosecutors told the court that police maintained reasonable suspicions indicating Tommy Robinson's mobile held material relevant to terrorist activities when they detained him last year as he attempted to leave the UK.

Denial to Give Phone Password

The right-wing campaigner, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, reportedly refused to hand over his password to police, claiming it included journalist content.” This happened after he was stopped at the Channel tunnel on 28 July 2024.

Trial Claims on Counter-Terrorism Powers

On the final day of the proceedings, prosecutor Jo Morris argued that the anti-terror authorities employed by law enforcement are designed to permit information collection. She asserted that police had valid grounds to believe the defendant continued to have links to far-right activists, even following the disbandment of the English Defence League (EDL).

While his affiliation of the English Defence League has come to an end, his beliefs have not gone away. He is recognized for holding those opinions and therefore it is a reasonable suspicion to believe that on his telephone there may be information pertaining to terrorist acts,” she informed Westminster magistrates court.

Morris continued, His opinions – to which he is allowed – were not the focus for their concern on July 28. It was his connection to individuals who are possibly engaged in prohibited activities.”

Circumstances of the Detention

The campaigner had arrived by himself at the Channel tunnel in a silver Bentley belonging to a friend and was traveling to the holiday destination of the Spanish coast with more than £13,000 in a small bag, the trial heard.

The funds was reportedly from a collection to offset expenses from organizing a large demonstration that occurred the day before in a London landmark.

Legal Team Arguments

Robinson, who denies non-compliance with counter-terrorism powers during the incident on 28 July of the previous year, could receive up to 90 days in prison or a potential £2,500 penalty if convicted.

His barrister, defense counsel, said in final arguments that anti-terror officers who stopped his client had engaged in a “fishing expedition” and that he had been unlawfully detained.

Citing testimony from police who said they contacted “partner agencies” after detaining him, Williamson claimed this was a reference to the intelligence agencies and that lack of proof had been presented from MI5 to suggest his client was a security threat.

He asserted the officers’ intervention was biased” because it was based to a large extent on a personal attribute.” He stated that the “predominant influence” on the decision to detain him was “‘oh look, it’s Tommy Robinson”.

He added that police had used an special authority that needs to be carefully regulated” to try to find out details that was already known. Williamson suggested that his client traveled to Benidorm frequently, which ought to have lessened the police concerns about him.

Expenses and Judgment Date

Robinson claimed that his legal costs in the case were being covered by the tech billionaire, the owner of X and Tesla, who has emerged as an ally of the campaigner and lately addressed a gathering organized by him in London via a livestream.

A proposed date of next Tuesday for the decision was altered by the district judge, the judge, after the defense explained his client was scheduled to be a invitee of the Israel's administration from the midweek and would not come back until 25 October.

{“I wouldn’t trouble you if this was a trip to Benidorm. I would ask him to rearrange it but he is a guest of a foreign government,” stated Williamson.

Goozee announced he would hand down his ruling on the start of 4 November.