🔗 Share this article

Among some of the most iconic images from modern history shows a naked young girl, her arms outstretched, her face twisted in agony, her skin burned and peeling. She can be seen fleeing towards the photographer while fleeing a bombing during the conflict. Beside her, youngsters also run away from the bombed village in the area, amid a backdrop of dark smoke and troops.

The International Impact from an Single Image

Just after the release in June 1972, this picture—formally called "Napalm Girl"—turned into a pre-digital hit. Viewed and debated by millions, it's generally credited with motivating global sentiment opposing the American involvement in Southeast Asia. One noted author later commented how the profoundly unforgettable image featuring the young Kim Phúc in distress possibly was more effective to increase public revulsion toward the conflict compared to extensive footage of broadcast atrocities. A legendary British war photographer who covered the war labeled it the ultimate photograph of the so-called “The Television War”. One more experienced combat photographer remarked how the photograph is simply put, one of the most important photographs ever taken, particularly from that conflict.

A Long-Held Attribution Followed by a Modern Allegation

For half a century, the image was assigned to the work of Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, a then-21-year-old South Vietnamese photojournalist on assignment for an international outlet during the war. Yet a provocative new investigation released by a global network claims which states the famous image—widely regarded to be the pinnacle of war journalism—was actually shot by someone else at the location during the attack.

According to the film, "Napalm Girl" was in fact captured by an independent photographer, who provided the images to the AP. The allegation, and its following inquiry, stems from an individual called Carl Robinson, who states how a dominant editor ordered him to change the photo's byline from the original photographer to the staff photographer, the one AP staff photographer on site at the time.

This Quest to find Answers

The source, now in his 80s, reached out to an investigator recently, seeking assistance in finding the unknown stringer. He expressed that, if he was still living, he wanted to give an acknowledgment. The filmmaker reflected on the unsupported photographers he worked with—likening them to modern freelancers, just as Vietnamese freelancers at the time, are frequently ignored. Their work is often questioned, and they function in far tougher conditions. They have no safety net, no retirement plans, they don’t have support, they usually are without proper gear, and they remain extremely at risk as they capture images in familiar settings.

The filmmaker pondered: How would it feel for the person who captured this image, if indeed he was not the author?” From a photographic perspective, he thought, it would be profoundly difficult. As a follower of the craft, specifically the celebrated documentation of Vietnam, it would be reputation-threatening, maybe career-damaging. The respected heritage of "Napalm Girl" among Vietnamese-Americans is such that the creator who had family fled at the time was hesitant to pursue the project. He said, I hesitated to unsettle the established story attributed to Nick the image. I also feared to change the status quo of a community that had long respected this accomplishment.”

This Inquiry Progresses

However both the filmmaker and his collaborator concluded: it was necessary asking the question. As members of the press must hold others accountable,” noted the journalist, it is essential that we are willing to ask difficult questions about our own field.”

The investigation tracks the journalists in their pursuit of their research, from testimonies from observers, to requests in today's Saigon, to archival research from other footage captured during the incident. Their search lead to a name: a driver, working for a television outlet at the time who also provided images to foreign agencies as a freelancer. In the film, a moved the claimant, now also advanced in age residing in California, claims that he handed over the image to the agency for a small fee and a copy, yet remained plagued without recognition for decades.

This Response and Additional Analysis

Nghệ appears throughout the documentary, reserved and thoughtful, however, his claim proved explosive within the community of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to